When teams say “we use UX tools,” they often mean very different things. Some tools focus on qualitative research. Others focus on analytics or experimentation. UXsniff sits in a different place entirely.

UXsniff approaches session recording differently from traditional video-based tools. Instead of capturing screen videos, UXsniff stores each session as a compact blob containing DOM mutations, interaction events, and precise timing data. This includes exactly when, where, and how users click, scroll, type, and move through a page.

The original Wayback Machine by the Internet Archive lets you see how websites looked in the past — a digital time capsule for the web. But what if you could go further and see how users behaved on those old designs? UXsniff’s Wayback Machine brings that idea to life for UX teams. It lets you revisit past heatmaps and A/B tests, compare user interactions across different design eras, and uncover which layouts truly worked — all without rerunning experiments. It’s like the Wayback Machine, but for your UX data.

Compare your current page to a past snapshot. AI analyzes session recordings and heatmaps, flags abnormal clicks, and shows conversion impact. Minimal setup.

In our latest exploration at UXsniff, we’re diving into a fascinating user behavior puzzle: When presented with a listing that features a striking banner, bold text like ‘Takeaway,’ and a clear URL link, where do users actually click the most? This intriguing study sheds light on the subtle yet powerful elements of web design that drive user interaction.

Which Pricing Model Do You Prefer Highlighting on Your Website: Monthly or Annually? Explore ‘The Pricing Page Tango’ to see how users navigate the dance between monthly and annual plans.